Last Detection

Hello I am very interested in this cheat however I am curious of its detection rate and when it was last detected.

'Vanity' pid='31695' dateline='1415739399' wrote:
Hello I am very interested in this cheat however I am curious of its detection rate and when it was last detected.

Hello, recently we changed security method, going from classic userdmod (ring3) to a ring0 protectiom, with the developing of our driver SecurEye.
We changed security method due to a high rate of detections.

yes but when was the most recent detection

A few Weeks ago that's why the changed to their own Ring0 protection (SecurEye)

SecurEye has not been detected.

Previous detections are irrelevant... read between the lines ;)

'viCe' pid='31754' dateline='1415780419' wrote:

'Vanity' pid='31695' dateline='1415739399' wrote:
Hello I am very interested in this cheat however I am curious of its detection rate and when it was last detected.

Hello, recently we changed security method, going from classic userdmod (ring3) to a ring0 protectiom, with the developing of our driver SecurEye.
We changed security method due to a high rate of detections.

@viCe can you please read your pm's thanks

he currently have problems connecting often, send me the pm you sent him and ill reply you

Yes but exactly what day was it detected and how long has it been exactly, and why is this version safer.

No one is going to go and check exactly what day, too much work after the forums have been revamped and certain topics have been pruned due to inactivity. This version is safer because we have a ring0 driver (32bit only atm) to help prevent VAC bans.

'MikeJones' pid='32359' dateline='1416155900' wrote:
No one is going to go and check exactly what day, too much work after the forums have been revamped and certain topics have been pruned due to inactivity. This version is safer because we have a ring0 driver (32bit only atm) to help prevent VAC bans.

Any ETA on when it'll become 64-bit? Once that comes out I'm definately buying it.