CSGO questions

th3man
Registered
Posts
26
Threads
7
Joined
Apr 2014
Reputation
-1
Hi guys.

1. Does this hack still have the seed trigger (aka prospread/RageTriggerbot)? I know VALVe has patched it and some other providers removed the 'prospread' triggerbot.

2. Is this good in HvH? I currently use another hack and I've yet to lose a HvH battle. Even in rage mode. How good is this honestly? Are there any unsecured servers we can test out HvH and have a hax war?

3. Could someone post the detection history? I ready in another thread that this was detected twice? Hasn't in only been around since February..?
kubrick
Banned
Posts
1,104
Threads
0
Joined
Feb 2014
Reputation
90
th3man wrote:Hi guys.

1. Does this hack still have the seed trigger (aka prospread/RageTriggerbot)? I know VALVe has patched it and some other providers removed the 'prospread' triggerbot.

2. Is this good in HvH? I currently use another hack and I've yet to lose a HvH battle. Even in rage mode. How good is this honestly? Are there any unsecured servers we can test out HvH and have a hax war?

3. Could someone post the detection history? I ready in another thread that this was detected twice? Hasn't in only been around since February..?

1.yes it still has the seed triggerbot

2.yes its good @hvh

3.it was only MATCHMAKING detected nothing more
Zim
Administrator
Posts
10,856
Threads
130
Joined
Feb 2014
Reputation
2,337
th3man wrote:Hi guys.

1. Does this hack still have the seed trigger (aka prospread/RageTriggerbot)? I know VALVe has patched it and some other providers removed the 'prospread' triggerbot.

2. Is this good in HvH? I currently use another hack and I've yet to lose a HvH battle. Even in rage mode. How good is this honestly? Are there any unsecured servers we can test out HvH and have a hax war?

3. Could someone post the detection history? I ready in another thread that this was detected twice? Hasn't in only been around since February..?

1)yes seed trigger still works

2)yes it's good connect here 85.131.199.245:27015 and we can test right now

3)it was never VAC detected, it was MM detected two times
th3man
Registered
Posts
26
Threads
7
Joined
Apr 2014
Reputation
-1
I didn't understand what you guys meant by matchmaking detected. Untrusted bans. Right, I get it now. Thanks.

As far as testing goes, I will fire up right now Italian. I'm not sure how this works so I hope to meet you in the server?
Zim
Administrator
Posts
10,856
Threads
130
Joined
Feb 2014
Reputation
2,337
th3man wrote:I didn't understand what you guys meant by matchmaking detected. Untrusted bans. Right, I get it now. Thanks.

As far as testing goes, I will fire up right now Italian. I'm not sure how this works so I hope to meet you in the server?

yes i'm there
Zim
Administrator
Posts
10,856
Threads
130
Joined
Feb 2014
Reputation
2,337
th3man wrote:I didn't understand what you guys meant by matchmaking detected. Untrusted bans. Right, I get it now. Thanks.

As far as testing goes, I will fire up right now Italian. I'm not sure how this works so I hope to meet you in the server?

second server wasn't working sorry
th3man
Registered
Posts
26
Threads
7
Joined
Apr 2014
Reputation
-1
No problem. I can confirm that Aimware was indeed the stronger hack...by quite a margin. Cheers guys.

Btw, I manager to connect to the second server and wait a couple minutes..hope I dont have an untrusted coming my way.
Zim
Administrator
Posts
10,856
Threads
130
Joined
Feb 2014
Reputation
2,337
th3man wrote:No problem. I can confirm that Aimware was indeed the stronger hack...by quite a margin. Cheers guys.

Btw, I manager to connect to the second server and wait a couple minutes..hope I dont have an untrusted coming my way.

don't think so